Seeking Excellence
Politics • Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle
“Human Rights” & Healthcare - Where do we draw the line?
PART 2 of 2 - So Is Healthcare a Human Right? Let's take a look.
October 25, 2023
post photo preview

PART 2

Part 1 was posted here on Locals on 10/18/2023 -- take a look at that article before reading on!

 

Our success has in many ways led to our own destruction. Due to the impressive results of the American system, we now live in an incredible time of comfort brought about by technological advancement.  For the first time ever, the vast majority of people are living in excess. Due to this excess, we’ve seen a massive increase in government entitlements over the last century. federalsafetynet.com gives this definition of government entitlements: 

“Entitlement Programs of the federal government include Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Unemployment, and welfare programs. Entitlement programs are rights granted to citizens and certain non-citizens by federal law. The programs are either contributory or non-contributory. Non-contributory means the program benefits are available to participants without regard to whether they have contributed to the program.”

In this, we find some familiar language. It reads, “Entitlement programs are rights granted to citizens by federal law.” For the sake of argument, let’s call these “government programs” and “political rights.”

There are, in fact, things we call rights that are provided to you by the government, such as your right to an attorney when you get arrested. We wouldn’t necessarily consider that to be a natural right, since you could always just defend yourself as many people in past legal disputes have done before; however, according to our system of law and order, it is a right you have as a citizen. 

Political rights are rights that are granted to you by the current system of law in a society. They can’t be called political rights until there is a respective existing law. Standing in contrast are natural rights that exist in all time and all places, regardless of what laws are on the books in a particular country.

One could make the argument that those advocating for universal healthcare as a right are stating that it is a “political right,” but this would be a dishonest take. We can freely, without moral judgment, debate whether or not something ought to be a political right. That doesn’t need to invoke such harsh name calling (such as bigot, racist, sexist, and the like) when one opposes it. There is righteous anger, however, when a person or group opposes the natural rights of individuals.  The people who advocate for healthcare as a right are arguing that it is a natural right, which is proven by two aspects of the argument:  1) they are not currently political rights, so you can’t discuss them as such and 2) they believe it is a moral failure to deprive someone of such “rights.”

An easy way to determine whether something is a natural right is through what I call the desert island experiment. Imagine ten of us are stranded on a desert island after a plane crash. Ideally, we’d start to work together to come up with some shelter, a way of finding food, and methods to provide for our other basic needs. After a few days, we may begin to discuss some ground rules. The reward for adhering to these ground rules is that you get to remain a member of the group and benefit from our combined efforts and progress. I believe that these ground rules would begin with natural rights to life, liberty, property, and self-defense. As we become more civilized and increase in size, we’d probably add freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the like. 

Most natural rights are passive, meaning that it doesn’t require anything of me to uphold your rights, and vice versa. Your right to property, free speech, and liberty simply outline things that I cannot do to you, not things that I must do for you. Forcing me to do things for another’s right would violate my right to freedom (just like the slavery example showed us earlier). On the desert island, it would make sense that we would abide by the wisdom found in St. Paul’s second letter to the Thessalonians chapter 3, 

 

“Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is living in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us. For you yourselves know how you ought to imitate us; we were not idle when we were with you, we did not eat any one’s bread without paying, but with toil and labor we worked night and day, that we might not burden any of you. It was not because we have not that right, but to give you in our conduct an example to imitate. For even when we were with you, we gave you this command: If any one will not work, let him not eat. For we hear that some of you are living in idleness, mere busybodies, not doing any work. Now such persons we command and exhort in the Lord Jesus Christ to do their work in quietness and to earn their own living. Brethren, do not be weary in well-doing.”

 

This was the starting place of our founding fathers. As they were building a country based on a radical new system of individual rights, citizenship, and government powers that are derived from the consent of the governed, they approached rights in this very critical and rational way. Over time, however, this philosophy began to shift and we began to violate some of these basic principles in a roundabout way – through taxation.

We can recognize that, if there are only 10 of us and we are all able-bodied, we ought to all contribute to the survival of the group. If I were to simply quit working and still expect to be fed, clothed, and sheltered, you’d be just in denying me the fruits of your labor and the labor of others. However, as society grows, you start to implement a system of taxes, for good reason, to continue this concept of contributing to the pool of resources to fund that which we all benefit from, such as national defense and our governing political body. 

In the US, over time, that taxation increased. In an effort to create a more loyal voter base and to try and “productively” use these excessive funds, the government began to expand the programs and entitlements to include welfare, medicare, and social security. 

As Christians, we may say that this was for the better. But was it really? I believe that I have a personal duty to give of my income to help support the poor, the sick, the suffering, and the elderly who are unable to provide for themselves. I believe equally that it would be morally wrong for me to steal from the rich to give to the poor. I could not walk into your house with a gun and take from your savings to go pay the medical bills for a poor family at the hospital down the street. 

But that is exactly what government programs do. They take money from some people by force to allocate it to the needs, or wants, of others. Many big-government minded believers seem to have forgotten this inconvenient truth. Whenever we discuss government entitlements, we are talking about taking money by force. Otherwise, it would be done privately through donations. When the government takes my money through social security taxes each paycheck, they aren’t setting that aside for me so that I may live comfortably in my retirement years. Even if they were, I never gave them permission to do that or opted into such a system. My social security taxes are paying for someone who is already of retirement age. According to ssa.gov, the social security admin’s own website: “Benefits are now expected to be payable in full on a timely basis until 2037, when the trust fund reserves are projected to become exhausted.” At which point, we will either raise taxes on my kids and grandkids or I won’t benefit from the social security system nearly to the extent I paid into it. 

 

I could say that this is just a sacrifice for the greater good of society. After all, I am called by Christ Himself to be charitable and generous to my neighbor. But let’s say I have a change of heart and just want to take a year off from this generous giving toward social security. What happens then? I would be arrested, fined, and sent to prison for tax evasion. That is what we can call government force. If I give by force, is that really giving? Is it really an act of virtue to offer up my money for the good of another at the threat of imprisonment and violence? 

We can only morally claim that those things to which we all ought to be forced to contribute should be provided by the government. These should generally be that which we all benefit from equally, such as national defense, police and fire departments, and the governing body of politics. 

Now, we return to the original question. Is healthcare a human right? We can easily determine that it is not. The idea itself can only be founded on flawed principles and immorality.

Let’s take a look back to our desert island.. Say that on the second day, it becomes known that one of the ten of us has cancer. Does that person have a right to chemotherapy with no equipment present? Do they have the right to continual care by people who cannot provide it? Even if one of the remaining 9 was a cancer doctor, would we be just in forcing him at the threat of violence to treat this cancer patient against his will? Now, we could have a separate debate on whether or not this doctor would have a moral obligation to work to the best of his ability to save the patient’s life, but given the other existing demands when on a desert island, there could be great disagreement on what that would look like. 

The simple point is that nobody has a right to something that doesn’t exist. If there were no more doctors, there could be no right to healthcare. Further, no person has a right to someone else’s effort. Nobody has a right to the use of resources they did not contribute to creating, purchasing, or maintaining.  I may feel a personal obligation to be the Good Samaritan and cover the cost for my neighbor. I may even feel that you, too, share this obligation. But it is morally wrong for me to force you to partake in this act of giving. 

Paragraph 2211 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church describes the protection of the right to medical care, among other things, as a duty of a just political community. I interpret this, again, as a passive observance of our rights rather than an active one. For example, in the line before, the CCC says that the government ought to ensure “the right to private property, to free enterprise, to obtain work and housing.” These rights are a list of what you can’t prevent me from doing, rather than a list of things you must provide for me. I have the right to private property, but you don’t owe me any material things. I have the right to free enterprise, but I’m not entitled to be handed capital to start my own business. I have the right to obtain work and housing, meaning you can’t prevent me from going to work or obtaining a place to live for my family (both things that the US government routinely does through excessive and unjust regulations). 

Similarly, US citizens have the right to bear arms, but we don’t give each person a gun provided by taxpayer dollars.

Some may push back against this, stating that the problem lies in the fact that there are other ways of denying someone access to healthcare. This is often where the word “affordable” comes around. This is a fair point. If a pharmaceutical company were to make the price of a widely needed medicine unaffordable for the bulk of the population, that would indeed be immoral. However, that would still not justify stealing from those who don’t need medicine in order to pay the ridiculously high prices. We do not believe that the ends justify the means.

Furthermore, knowing that the government will subsidize the costs of medicine is part of what keeps the prices so high in the first place. This points to a common economic fallacy, which is that raising prices leads to more revenue. This is often applied to the philosophy of taxation as well – that is that if we raise the tax rate, we will raise tax revenue.  This is just not always the case. 

This truth is that there is a point at which raising prices or taxes leads to a decrease in revenue. After all, if people can’t afford to buy it, you’re not going to make much money selling at a higher cost. The interference of government through taxation, regulations, and insurance mandates often lead to much higher costs for medicine here in the US than we see in other countries around the world. 

The solution to most economic issues, such as inflation, is less government interference, not more. 

Most of the bad economic policies in place today fall into one of two shortcomings: either they only consider the results for a small percentage of the population and/or they only consider the immediate results. When we take in the larger picture, as we have done here, you can see the moral and economic impacts of big government policies. 

However, if you’ve allowed the government to become your god, you can’t help but want it to constantly increase in size and scope. If the government is god, you would have to believe and hope that it can be the solution to all the problems within humanity. However, history and logic have always shown that this is a strategy destined to fail. A government simply cannot provide for the wants and needs of all its people, all the time. More government control does not lead to more human flourishing. The state is incapable of creating heaven on earth. 

Ultimately, this debate leads us back to the necessity of God in our society. As I stated earlier, the American system is not reliant upon every citizen being a Christian, but it does, like any civilized society that hopes to not devolve into chaos and depravity, require God for the order and structure necessary for its survival. 

This is why the ever-increasing population of "nones" in the US should be alarming to us and why we must fight against it. The system that has provided more prosperity, security, and human flourishing than any that came before it, but can not remain as such if it is filled with atheists. 

We find this type of thinking throughout most modern cultural debates. Religious conservatives are often painted as trying to force their views on the rest of the world, but this often misses the point. I, as a conservative Catholic, am not trying to push my views on the world. Rather, I am trying to express the right order as it is revealed through Natural Law and human reason. That differs immensely from most of my opponents who would rather craft the world according to their personal opinions and secular worldview. I’ve never once heard a Catholic say that it should be mandated by law that we all attend mass on Sundays, but rather that we should advocate for the protection of natural rights agreed upon by all believers. Contrarily, I have heard advocates of the Progressive ideology mandate that we all do and say things that align with their beliefs.

These disagreements come down to a matter of hierarchy. There are those of us who believe that we are subject to God’s law, which encompasses natural law. There are many in the middle of these debates who simply don’t care one way or the other. Then there are those who subconsciously subscribe to the motto of the Satanic Temple:  “Thyself is Thy Master.” The Devil himself is known for those infamous words “Non serviam,” or “I will not serve.” Placing yourself (or humanity) at the top of the hierarchy leads to hell both here on earth and in the afterlife. 

In Mark 10:45, Jesus tells His disciples, “For even the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve, and to offer His life as a ransom for many.” If we strive to build a society with citizenry who are willing to serve God, country, family, and one another, we will be much better off than building a self-destructive society that provides all needs for free by force and the threat of violence. 

Let us not shy away from boldly proclaiming these truths both for our sake and for the sake of future generations.

I would like to finish by turning to 1 Timothy 4: 

A Good Minister of Jesus Christ

6 If you put these instructions before the brethren, you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus, nourished on the words of the faith and of the good doctrine which you have followed. 7 Have nothing to do with godless and silly myths. Train yourself in godliness; 8 for while bodily training is of some value, godliness is of value in every way, as it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come. 9 The saying is sure and worthy of full acceptance. 10 For to this end we toil and strive, because we have our hope set on the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe. 11 Command and teach these things. 12 Let no one despise your youth, but set the believers an example in speech and conduct, in love, in faith, in purity. 13 Till I come, attend to the public reading of scripture, to preaching, to teaching. 14 Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophetic utterance when the council of elders laid their hands upon you. 15 Practice these duties, devote yourself to them, so that all may see your progress. 16 Take heed to yourself and to your teaching; hold to that, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.

 

 

 

community logo
Join the Seeking Excellence Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
The Santa debate!

Is Promoting Santa a Lie? Or Is It Innocent Fun?

00:14:22
"My daughter was really offended by your talk last night." 😅

"My daughter was really offended by your talk last night."

Someone dropped this bomb on me unexpectedly after daily mass this past summer. Although I can sometimes be a bit dicey and bold in my presentations, I was pretty shocked to hear it.

I had given a talk to middle schoolers the night prior on how our faith can help us in managing sadness, anxiety, and stress.

After mass the next day, I was walking in the convention center and was stopped by a woman who asked if I spoke to the middle schoolers the night prior. I responded in the affirmative.

"My daughter was really offended by your talk."

In a flash, I try to recall what I said that might have been the trigger for offense. Nothing came to mind. So I inquired, "Interesting. What was it that bothered her?"

"She said that you told the kids that if you experience anxiety, you can essentially pray it all away. And she has been clinically diagnosed with severe anxiety so it upset her."

"AH okay, I see the misunderstanding here" I ...

00:56:59
I am a Charlie Kirk, not a George Floyd

Over the last few days, I've taken a lot of time to reflect on the importance of this moment for our nation and for the Church.

Here are further reflections on these recent events and what I think we ought to do from here.

00:36:22
Acts of Faith: Bishop Johnson on Saying Yes to God

In this first-ever Seeking Excellence episode with a BISHOP, Bishop James Johnson joins me for a powerful conversation on vocation, leadership, Catholic schools, generosity, and what it really means to trust God.

We talk about his journey from engineer to priest to bishop, the challenges of leading a diocese, why Catholic education matters, and how giving reveals what we truly believe.

Listen here: https://open.spotify.com/episode/00wfPWk0OWnFtNePMkYTne?si=dUIZqUcoSl6i3WdiHsHsnw

Happy Easter!

Wishing you a happy Easter from the Crankfields!

post photo preview
You Were Not Made To Do This Life ALone

25% of men ages 15-35 reported feeling serious loneliness the day before being surveyed. That is one in four men. And if you are married with kids, it does not automatically get better.

In this recorded livestream, I break down why the loneliness epidemic is hitting men so hard, why most of us are making it worse without realizing it, and what it actually takes to build real friendships as a busy husband and father.

If you have been feeling isolated, like you do not have the kind of friendships that actually sharpen you, this one is for you.

Watch here:

Poverty Is Not A Christian Virtue

Doctors call it Pertussis. Most people know it as Whooping Cough. The real ones know it as the “100-day cough”, and let me tell you, it has rightfully earned that nickname.

Our son has had it for most of 2026. Ninety-eight days as of this writing. It has been the hardest stretch of our parenting journey so far, a relentless grind that demanded everything my wife had to give while I was traveling for work more than I wanted to be. She showed up every single day without complaint, doing what mothers do, which is everything.

With the end finally in sight, I planned a date night. Not an extravagant one in any grand scheme of things, but a real one. A lovely steakhouse downtown, then a walk over to the performing arts center to watch Ben Rector perform with the Kansas City Symphony. Dinner, music, my wife across the table looking the way she does when she finally gets a night off from the hardest job she has ever had.

Then home, where our two children were sleeping peacefully. The next morning I took my son golfing.

I am telling you this because it is the kind of evening that would not have been possible at every stage of my life, and because it illustrates something I have been thinking about for a long time: what financial success is actually supposed to look like for a Christian, and how badly we tend to get it wrong in both directions.

 

The Two Extremes

As a Catholic navigating the world of business, leadership, and faith, I find that most people fall into one of two extremes when it comes to money. And both of them are wrong.

The first extreme is the one occupied by the people who have made money into their mission. You see this in certain corners of the entrepreneurship and influencer world: people who work seven days a week and have structured their lives to eliminate things that might slow wealth accumulation, including marriage, children, and anything else that demands of them without a financial return. When you ask them what they are working toward, the answer tends to be perplexing. It’s usually an almost inconceivably high number, which typically represents status or a feeling of security that, if you listen carefully, always seems to be just one more comma away.

I understand the pull of that world. I listen to some of those voices myself. There is real wisdom in the conversation about ambition, discipline, and building something. But when ambition becomes the organizing principle of a life rather than a tool in service of something larger, what you get is not freedom. It is a large house with a dying marriage and no children, which is not wealth by any standard that actually matters.

The second extreme is less obvious but equally real. You find it among some faithful Christians who have, whether intentionally or through a series of small decisions, arrived at a posture that treats money and ambition as inherently suspect. They have spiritualized poverty without fully examining whether that spiritualization is serving their family or simply excusing a failure to provide. I have seen this play out in painful ways: a man who wants his wife to be able to stay home with their young children but whose career choices have made that nearly impossible, not because the circumstances were unavoidable but because he never took his financial responsibilities seriously enough.

Both of these people think they are doing something virtuous. The first thinks he is being disciplined and ambitious. The second thinks he is being humble and detached. Both have missed something essential, but tend to be great defenders of their chosen path.

It Is Not Virtuous to Be Poor. It Is Not Virtuous to Be Rich.

The Catholic tradition has a concept that I think cuts directly through this confusion. It is called the virtuous mean, and it comes from Aristotle through Aquinas. The idea is that most virtues exist between two corresponding vices. Courage is the mean between cowardice and recklessness. Generosity is the mean between greed and financial self-destruction. The virtue is not a compromise between the two extremes. It is something qualitatively different, the right disposition ordered toward the right end.

What is the virtuous mean when it comes to money? I think it is this: provision as an act of love, ordered toward the people entrusted to you.

 

The question is not simply whether you have money. The question is what the money is serving. Is your ambition serving your vocation, or is it replacing it? That distinction is everything. A man who works hard, earns well, and directs that provision toward his wife and children, toward his community, toward his capacity to give generously, is not worshipping money. He is exercising stewardship. A man who works just as hard but is running from responsibility, chasing a feeling, or building an empire that his family will inherit without ever having known him, has made money into something it was never meant to be.

Scripture is clear that the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. It does not condemn money itself, but the love of it. The disordering of desire that puts financial accumulation above the relationships, responsibilities, and purposes that give a life its actual meaning. That disordering can happen at any income level. A man with very little can be just as enslaved to the pursuit of money as a man with a great deal of it. And a man with significant wealth can hold it lightly, use it generously, and be entirely free of the love of it.

We often forget that an obsession with money is also a bad thing. One who is constantly under financial strain will typically have money on their mind, much like those who are overly materialistic and wealth-focused. My parents often argued about money because there was seldom a lot of it. I thought about money much more frequently when I lived in Denver with a $4,500/month mortgage than I do now in a more affordable home and city.

If you enjoy thought-provoking content on how to live a mission-driven life, I invite you to subscribe!

 

Now my mental energy is spent on better things, as St. Paul encourages us in Philippians 4.

Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is gracious, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.

Phillippians 4:8

Provision Is an Act of Love

I want to push back on something I think has quietly infected the way many Christian men approach their financial responsibilities.

There is a version of Christian humility that gets weaponized against ambition and career investment, leaving families worse off than they need to be. The man who shrugs off advancement opportunities because he does not want to seem worldly, who fails to develop his earning capacity because it feels unspiritual, who has not thought seriously about retirement, life insurance, or financial planning because those conversations feel too materialistic, is not being holy. He is being negligent.

Providing well for your family is not a distraction from your vocation. For a husband and father, it is a core expression of it. The man who works with discipline and skill, who takes his career seriously, who builds financial stability for his family is doing something with real spiritual weight. He is creating the conditions under which his wife can be present, his children can be cared for, his family can be generous, and his household can be a place of genuine hospitality and abundance.

The date night I described at the beginning of this article was not frivolous. It was the fruit of long days, hard work, and a decision to take my responsibility as a provider seriously. It was also a gift to my wife that no amount of spiritual sentiment could have replaced. She needed that evening. I was able to give it to her. That is what provision in service of love looks like.

 

More Than Enough Enables Generosity

There is one more dimension to this that I do not want to skip over, because I think it is one of the strongest arguments for taking your financial life seriously as a Christian.

When you have more than you need, you can give abundantly. And giving abundantly is one of the clearest expressions of the Christian life that exists.

The person who is financially stretched has very little margin for generosity. They give what they can, which is often not much, and they feel the pinch of every gift. The person who has built genuine financial stability, who has done the unglamorous work of living below their means and building margin into their life, can give in ways that are genuinely sacrificial without being genuinely destabilizing. They can respond to a need in their community. They can support a cause they believe in. They can be the house that other families gather around, the couple that funds the mission trip, the family that opens their table without counting the cost.

That kind of generosity is not possible without financial intentionality. It does not require being rich. It requires being purposeful, which is something every Christian family can choose regardless of income level.

What the Virtuous Mean Actually Looks Like

I am not rich. I want to be honest about that because I think it matters for the credibility of what I am saying. My wife and I are not operating from a position of extraordinary wealth. I started off my career in the Army with $600 in my bank account. My wife now stays home with our two kids, and we have no financial worries. We are two people who have made intentional decisions about how we earn, spend, save, and give, and those decisions have created a life that feels genuinely abundant without being excessive.

What does that look like practically? It looks like taking my career seriously without making it the center of my identity. It looks like long days on the road sometimes, and a genuine commitment to being present when I am home. It looks like a budget we actually review together, growing savings, and giving that is uncomfortable enough to mean something. It looks like a date night at a steakhouse when my wife needs it, and a morning on the golf course with my son when he needs it, and the financial margin to do both without anxiety.

 

It also looks like resisting the pull toward more for its own sake. I do not have an inexplicable need to accumulate beyond what serves my family and my mission. That is not because I am indifferent to money. It is because I have decided what money is for, and that decision makes almost every financial choice easier.

You can aim to do both. Be a great provider and a present spouse and parent. Take your career seriously and hold it loosely. Build wealth intentionally and give generously. Work hard and rest well. None of those are contradictions. They are the natural fruits of getting the ordering right, of making sure that your ambition serves your vocation rather than replaces it.

It is hard and exhausting, and it requires constant recalibration. But it is very much worth it.

And on the nights when you are sitting across the table from your wife at a steakhouse while your kids sleep peacefully at home, you will know that you got something right.

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Message for the Boomers
A Plea To Older Generations To Right The Wrongs Of The Past Through Action

I know what you’re probably thinking — a young Millennial known for his hot takes is about to lay down the hammer on the older folks. Well, if that’s what you are hoping for, this probably will disappoint you.

I will certainly be laying out some critiques, but this message overall is meant to inspire and encourage the older generations to be exactly that: the older generations, the heroes we need in our day and age. The heroes that every age needed. But that we are missing at historical levels in our current moment.

Here is a photo with one of my mentors and heroes in life, President Stephen Minnis of Benedictine College.

 

The Context

First, a personal story to help lay the context.

Earlier this year, I attended a Catholic men’s conference in Kansas City. You typically find a few common personas at these men’s conferences:

  1. The young, optimistic, hopeful guy who is there to learn more about what it means to be a great Catholic man.

  2. The older, wise Catholic man who has managed to successfully live out much of the wisdom that is shared. He has grown faithful children and feels affirmed by what is shared from those holding the microphone.

  3. The late convert/revert to the faith — the man who feels as though, whether to a large or small degree, that he has failed his children by his late conversion, neglecting to live out most of the principles shared by the presenters at the conference.

I’d put myself in category 1. The majority of the audience tends to be about a 30/70 split between 2 and 3. The problem is that a great chasm exists in our parishes and society between men in category 1 and those in categories 2 and 3.

This became clear when I was standing in line for confession. The men behind me were talking openly about how their adult children don’t practice the faith, sharing how hard it can be to hear about all the things they wish they’d known in their 20s and 30s.

Hearing this, I get this overwhelming sense that they believe they wasted the time when their kids would have listened to them, and now that they lack that same influence, they feel there is next to nothing they can do. They feel like they have nothing to offer. And so, they go to mass, volunteer where they can, and enjoy their early-morning men’s group meetings, surrounded by other old men with the same frustrations.

You can imagine my surprise when, despite our having just met earlier that day, one of them asked me my opinion on the matter. “Why do you think our adult children won’t listen to us? You’re here today. Why are you still Catholic?”

It’s one of the most common questions I get from dejected parents with adult, secular children. And it’s a fair one. But the truth is that the negative emotions they are feeling are quite valid. Many older parents simply missed the boat on their children. You only have them, and their ear, for so long. Your presence and example matter a LOT when they are small. And if you blow it, you don’t get to just redo it when they’re in their 30s.

But that’s not why we’re here today. We’re here today to discuss the same perspective change that I provided these men on the day of the conference by simply replying to them:

“Man, I don’t know what happened with your adult kids, but I can tell you that there are many young men who could benefit from learning from you and would be eager to listen. I haven’t spoken to my Dad in two years. I have a demanding job. I’ve got two young kids and a wife. And I’m generally just out here navigating it all alone. I’ve almost never had an older man at any parish I’ve belonged to, or even visited, invite me out to lunch or breakfast to get to know me and share some wisdom. You have a lot to offer, even if the ones you most desperately desire to give it to don’t want it.”

You have a lot to offer. There are many people who need it. But you’re so upset that those you want to give the gift to keep rejecting it that you won’t just hand it to the next person standing there with open arms.

I witnessed the light bulb come on. I saw the click. And this is what I want to encourage today.

The Coddling of the American Mind and Soul

Millennials and Gen Zers were raised, for the most part, by parents who coddled them into ineptitude. Regarding faith, we had parents who tried to entirely outsource the responsibility for being our primary educators. We were eagerly dropped off at college—unable to do laundry, cook dinner, or avoid signing up for debt that would financially paralyze us for decades.

We were sent to school for education, but we were never really formed. We now have many women who want to be stay-at-home moms, some of whom were even raised by stay-at-home moms, who have no idea how to run a household. We have men who were never taught by their fathers what it means to be a good husband and father, who were never shown or trained how to provide, protect, and lead.

My mom, like many of my friends’ moms, did almost everything for me when I was younger. I had to occasionally empty the dishwasher or walk the dog, but I certainly wasn’t waking up to long to-do lists on Saturday mornings. And did I complain about this then? Absolutely not. I thought I was living the dream.

My friends mostly thought the same. They enjoyed the helicopter parenting. Mom stayed on top of your upcoming due dates for projects and homework assignments. Even into college, some moms are scheduling every appointment and need for their adult kids. I was blessed that the Army didn’t play that game, so even in ROTC, I had to start taking ownership of my life and growing up.

 

Most, however, didn’t choose to join the military. And they were unburdened of responsibility well into their 20s, unlike the generations before us. And unlike those who came before us, many young people today find themselves unable to cope with everyday life.

And somehow, they are told that this is their fault.

I believe this is the root cause of the intergenerational tension we experience today. For years, the older folks talked about how lazy and entitled millennials were and how emotional and odd Gen Z is. Now, the latter two blame the older generations for creating a political, economic, and familial environment that has put us in a downward spiral we’re unsure we can correct.

It is a general rule that finding the right person to blame for a problem is less useful than finding a good solution, so that will remain our focus for today.

If you enjoy this type of thought-provoking content, subscribe for more. I am so thankful for the encouragement of free subscribers and the support of paid members.

See a Need, Fill a Need

Boomers and Gen Xers, we need you. We need you to step up and fill the gap that you or your peers helped create. We need you to stop lamenting the failures of the past and to be involved in making a better future.

Let me give you some examples of what this can look like.


We recently had a friend over for dinner. She and her roommates are all single girls in their mid-20s. She told us about their “wife nights”, where they go over to a woman’s house and learn what it looks like to manage a household. The host is a 45-year-old woman whom they met through Church. She cooks with them, shows them how to plan meals and grocery shop for a family of 7, and how she balances everything that needs to get done in a given week.


When my wife and I were expecting our first, I told her I wanted to have a “Dad party”. As I mentioned earlier, my father and I don’t have the best relationship. Besides, he’s had seven children with five different women, several of whom he hardly raised at all. I wouldn’t say he’s what I aim to be as a father.

Luckily for me, my wife’s family was close to some really amazing Dads in their 40s. My wife contacted one of their wives with the idea. And she and her husband ran with it. He invited about six of his good friends and family members, most of whom I knew, over for a bonfire complete with bourbon and some good food.

We sat around the fire for almost four hours while I asked questions about fatherhood and marriage. What’s amazing is that I think each one of them enjoyed and benefited from it, albeit in different ways, almost as much as I did.

We have bridal showers, baby showers, dress shopping, and all types of things where older and younger women come together to celebrate and shape a woman who is entering a new, hugely important stage of life. And what do men have? Bachelor parties. It’s insufficient and needs to be addressed, especially in light of today’s crisis of masculinity.

Why can’t every church in America do this quarterly for new dads? How much would this simple night change the world?


A man I know has been extremely financially successful. He would fall into category 3 under our definitions above, although he seemed pretty intentional and faithful even when his kids were young. His situation is much more of a mystery to me.

But he takes it upon himself to coach young men with growing families who probably couldn’t afford an executive coach. He volunteers his time to help them with their business/leadership decisions, both at work and at home.

And I don’t think we consider this sort of generosity enough. My wife and I were at a fancy steakhouse in Denver about a year ago, just dreaming about the future. I told her how much I’d love to take young, engaged couples out and just share hard-earned wisdom on marriage and family life with them over an expensive, lovely 3-hour dinner.

We just did this recently, where we had a young couple over for steaks at home. They are expecting their first child this fall, and we thought it would be wonderful to host them, get to know them, and see what we could offer in the realm of the life-altering event that is becoming a parent. It doesn’t have to be fancy or expensive. The most valuable thing you can offer someone is your time and active listening.


Where to go from here

I think people overuse priests as spiritual directors. It wasn’t meant to be this way. Most people don’t need a priest for spiritual direction. What they really need is mentorship from a wise, virtuous person of the same sex who is further down the road than they are. Priests have their place, and it is an extremely important one. But as their population declines, we need them to do the work only they can do.

 

Mentorship is not one of those things. Priests and religious need spiritual directors. People with serious mental health issues need therapy. But most of us just need someone to talk to who can help us feel heard, understood, encouraged, and challenged to be better.

You don’t have to wait to be a mentor and help others. You don’t need to have your life all put together to love someone. Sure, if your life is a blazing dumpster fire, perhaps you aim for more presence and support than providing advice, but even those who may feel like they know a lot more of what not to do than what actually makes for a good life can provide support to young families in numerous ways.

If you’re in college or young adulthood, try to find a high school or college student who could use a listening ear and an older friend.

If you’re in your early 30s like me, find those young dating, engaged, or recently married couples who you can support through these transitions.

If your kids are now all in grade school, find those families at church who are battling toddler tantrums and potty training. Invite them into the busyness of your lives. Have the mom over for coffee or the dad over for a drink. Just talk to them. Build a relationship. Care about who they are and what concerns them. It can literally change a person’s life or save a marriage.

If your kids are now adults, do the same thing with the generation behind you. Get involved. Don’t just sit on the sidelines and pout about the days past. The time is now, and it’s the best time to act.

It is so easy to be selfish. Our society today creates an environment where selfishness is not only tolerated, but promoted and encouraged. It is so easy to think you are too busy, too imperfect, or too stressed to offer your time and resources to others.

But I want you to know that this is a lie from the devil himself. As I mentioned in the example of my “Dad party”, the giver of the gift in these situations is often as inspired and changed by the act of giving as the recipient is.

You’ll find that this crazy thing happens—you’ll feel needed, useful, and have deeper meaning and purpose in your life. You’ll feel appreciated. You will step outside yourself and focus on how to add value to others' lives. It will cause a domino effect of paradigm shifts in your life. You will be a better Christian, better spouse, and better human because of it.

Read full Article
The Heaviest Weight At The Gym
Why Habits Are Easy To Start But Hard to Maintain

Let me tell you about my weight.

When I was in the Army, I was in the best shape of my life. Preparing for Ranger School does that to you. I graduated from high school at about 185 lbs. After my freshman year of ROTC, I was 195 lbs. I got up to about 207 lbs through my Infantry training and the lead-up to Ranger School. I got to the point where I was running five miles in 35 minutes while being strong enough to handle the heavy, slow movements during missions.

They call it the Army’s elite weight loss program. You come out the other side much leaner than you went in, partly because the program is extraordinarily demanding and partly because they feed you roughly two meals a day while you’re burning an unfathomable amount of calories. I lost twenty pounds in the first twenty-one days. By the end, I had been broken down and rebuilt in ways that went far beyond the physical.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

After graduation, I was sent to my first and only assignment at the 82nd Airborne Division in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, where I’d serve as a Platoon Leader. During our deployment to Afghanistan in 2017, I rebuilt my body to the strongest I had ever been. I got my weight up to 225 lbs and was setting personal records on the bench press, deadlift, and squat rack.

Two years later, I transitioned out of the military and into civilian life, and the structure that had kept me disciplined without my having to think about it was suddenly gone. No formation runs. No mandatory PT. No one checking whether you were maintaining standards. Just me, a desk job, and a world full of decisions I had not had to make for myself in years.

My weight has gone up and down nearly every year since. It has fluctuated in ways most don’t pick up on, but enough that I notice. It’s enough that it bothers me. I will build momentum for a few months, get into a real groove, feel like I have finally cracked the code, and then something shifts. My life has been flooded with change post-military: new jobs, new homes, marriage, two babies, promotions at work, you name it. And the fitness habits I thought I had locked in turn out to be more fragile than I believed.

I am telling you this not to confess a failure but to establish a credential. I know exactly what it feels like to start strong and lose all the momentum you’ve built. And because I know that feeling so well, I have spent a lot of time thinking about why it happens and what actually separates those who build lasting habits from those who do not.

What James Clear Got Right

James Clear, the author of Atomic Habits, said something recently on a podcast that was simple yet profound. He said, “A habit must be established before it can be improved. ” And then he said this: the heaviest weight at the gym is the front door.

Both of those sentences are true, and they are worth sitting with.

The first one is a correction to a mistake almost every ambitious person makes. We plan the optimal version before establishing the basic version. We research the perfect workout split before we go to the gym three times in a row. We design the ideal content strategy before we have published ten pieces of anything. We map out the perfect morning routine before we have proven to ourselves that we can get up on time for two weeks running.

Optimization should be a reward for consistency. You ought not do it before you’ve earned it.

The second sentence, about the front door, captures something every person who has ever tried to build a habit already knows intuitively but rarely articulates clearly. The barrier to showing up is almost never the work itself. It is the friction between where you are and where the work happens. It is the gap between the couch and the gym bag. It’s the chasm between the bed and the desk. It’s the intimidating distance that exists between the comfortable and the required.

Clear’s whole system is built around reducing that friction. Make the good behavior easier. Make the bad behavior harder. Stack habits onto existing ones. Start so small that failure becomes almost impossible. It is excellent advice, and it has helped millions of people.

But there is something it does not fully prepare you for. And it is the thing that actually kills most habits.

Nobody Plans for Week Three

The first week of a new habit is almost always fine. You have novelty on your side. The decision is fresh. The motivation is high. You tell people about it, which creates a little social accountability. You feel good about yourself for starting. Week one tends to take care of itself.

Week two is where the first cracks appear. The novelty is wearing off. The motivation has dropped from a ten to maybe a six. You have your first bad day or missed session, and you have to decide whether it is a blip or a trend. Most people who make it this far make it through week two.

Week three is where habits go to die.

By week three, life has reasserted itself. The calendar has filled back up. The kids are sick, or you are sick, or work explodes, or you travel, or you have a brutal week that leaves you with nothing in reserve. And the habit that felt so solid two weeks ago is suddenly just one more thing on a list of things you do not have the energy for.

Here is what almost nobody tells you: this is not a sign that you have failed. It is a sign that you have arrived at the actual test. The early weeks are the entrance exam. Week three is the midterm.

The problem is that most people treat week three as an anomaly. We act like the disruption is the exception and the perfect week is the rule. But life is not made up of perfect weeks. Perfect weeks are the exception. They almost never happen. Disruption, difficulty, and competing demands are the rule. If your habit can only survive ideal conditions, it is not a habit. It is a hobby you do when things are going well.

The Podcast Graveyard

I want to give you a data point that I find both sobering and clarifying.

Approximately 90 percent of podcasts never make it past episode three. Almost half of all shows ever created have been abandoned after just a handful of episodes. Of the podcasts that do make it past the first three episodes, 90 percent of those do not reach episode twenty. Which means that publishing episode twenty-one puts you in the top one percent of all podcasters in the world. One percent. From a bar of twenty-one episodes.

I have published over 400 podcast episodes over almost 6 years.

If you’re reasonable, your response to that shouldn’t be applause or to feel impressed. It should be a prayer that nobody has actually listened to that much of my ramblings. The good news is that most people haven’t. Shout out to the 17 of you who have.

Anyway, I'm not saying that to brag. I say it because those four hundred episodes happened across one of the most turbulent stretches of my life. I recorded episodes while going through a new job. Multiple moves. An engagement. A wedding. The birth of my first child and then my second. The loss of my oldest sister. Seasons of exhaustion where recording felt like the last thing I had the capacity for.

I also recorded episodes that were not very good. Episodes where the audio quality was rough, the content was thin, and the energy was low. I published them anyway. Because I had learned something early on that took me a while to fully internalize: done is better than perfect, and showing up imperfectly is infinitely better than not showing up at all.

The perfect is not just the enemy of the good. It is the most common excuse well-meaning people use to justify quitting.

Playing Hurt vs. Playing Injured

There is a difference between playing hurt and playing injured.

Playing hurt means showing up when conditions are suboptimal. You are tired. You are stressed. Life is not cooperating. The last thing you feel like doing is the thing your habit requires. But you are functional. You are capable. You are choosing comfort over commitment when you stay home, and you know it.

Playing injured means showing up when doing so would actually make things worse. You have the flu, and you are considering going to the gym because you do not want to break your streak. You are running on two hours of sleep and wondering whether skipping your morning routine counts as a failure. These are not the same situations.

When I had the flu recently and my whole family was sick at the same time, I did not go to the gym. That was not weakness. That was wisdom. Your body is not going to benefit from a workout when it is fighting a virus. Your immune system needs the resources you would spend on the barbell. Resting when you are genuinely ill is not an excuse. It is the prudent choice.

But here is the other side of that coin: choosing to stay out late on a Tuesday night and then using exhaustion as a reason to skip your Wednesday morning workout is not the same thing. You made a choice. That choice had a cost. Pretending the cost does not exist is not self-love. It is self-deception.

One of the most clarifying questions I have learned to ask myself in these moments is: Am I actually unable to do this, or am I just unwilling? Those are completely different situations, and they require completely different responses. Inability deserves grace, but unwillingness deserves honesty and accountability.

The goal is not to white-knuckle through every hard moment regardless of your actual condition. The goal is to develop the self-awareness to distinguish between the two. And to stop letting the legitimate excuses cover for the illegitimate ones.

The Habit That Exposes Me Most

I want to get personal for a moment about the habit that exposes the gap between my intentions and my execution more than any other.

My prayer life falls apart when I travel.

At home, I have a rhythm. I know when I pray, where I pray, and roughly what that time looks like. The habit is anchored to a place and a routine that holds it in place. But when I travel, all of those anchors disappear. Travel brings a ton of chaotic unknowns: different time zones, different schedules, dinners that run late, and early-morning flights. Hotel rooms never quite feel like places where prayer happens naturally.

This is not a new problem. In the Army, deployed to Afghanistan, I went weeks between opportunities to attend Mass. In Ranger School, I had Mass once over the course of thirteen weeks. The external structures that support your routines are not always available. Life is hard, and this shouldn’t be news.

And yet, I have not fully solved this. I will be honest about that. But I have gotten better at it. What helps me most is accepting in advance that travel is a disruption and building a minimal version of my prayer habit that is specifically designed for disrupted conditions. It is not the ideal version, but rather the survival version. The version that keeps the thread from breaking entirely, even when the conditions are not perfect.

A decade ago, I would have told you that a five-minute rosary in a hotel room was a failure compared to my normal hour of prayer. Now I understand it as a victory. It is the thing that keeps the habit alive when the habit wants to die. And a habit that is alive, even barely, is much easier to maintain. A dead habit has to be rebuilt from scratch.

The System That Has Kept Me Honest

The single practice that has done more to keep my habits alive than anything else is not a productivity hack or a motivational framework. It is something far simpler and far less glamorous.

I review my goals every day, every week, and every month.

Daily, I look at what I said I was going to do and check it against what I actually did.

Weekly, I do a broader review of the week: where I showed up, where I fell short, and what I am going to do differently.

Monthly, I look at the bigger picture, at whether I am making progress on the things that matter most, and at the gap between where I am and where I said I wanted to be.

This practice is uncomfortable and often exposing. And that's the whole point.

When I skip workouts, the daily review makes me look at the skipped workouts. When my prayer life has fallen off, the weekly review makes me sit with that fact rather than let it quietly become the new normal. When I am drifting from the person I said I wanted to be, the monthly review shows me the drift before it becomes a chasm.

Most people avoid this kind of honest accountability because it requires them to confront failure. But failure that is confronted is failure that can be corrected. Failure that is avoided just compounds quietly in the background until the gap between who you are and who you intended to be is so large it feels insurmountable.

I have failed at a lot of goals over the years. My weight, as I said, has fluctuated in ways that frustrate me. There are habits I have built and lost more than once. There are commitments I have made to myself that I have not kept as fully as I intended. The review practice does not prevent those failures. What it does is force me to own them, learn from them, and get back on track faster than I would otherwise.

The goal is not a perfect record. It is an honest one. And an honest record is what allows you to make real improvements instead of just feeling vaguely bad about where you are.

What Actually Works: A Framework for Getting Past Week Three

First, design your habit around your worst week, not your best. Most people design habits around the version of their life where everything is going well. That version of your life is rare. Design for the version where you are tired, traveling, and overwhelmed, and ask what the minimum viable version of this habit looks like under those conditions. That minimum viable version is your survival protocol. Use it as a baseline.

Second, decide in advance what constitutes a legitimate excuse and what does not. Before you need to make the call under pressure, decide where your lines are. Genuine illness: legitimate. Genuine family emergency: legitimate. Tired because you stayed up too late: not legitimate. Busy because you did not manage your time well: not legitimate. When the moment comes, you will not have to decide. You already decided.

Third, never miss twice. This is the rule that has saved more of my habits than any other. One missed day is a blip. Two missed days are the beginning of a pattern. Three missed days and the habit is on life support. If you miss once, the only thing that matters is what you do next. Show up the following day, even if the session is shorter, messier, and less impressive than you wanted it to be. The streak you are protecting is not the unbroken one. It is the one you always come back to.

Fourth, review honestly and regularly. Daily, weekly, monthly. Make failure visible. Make progress visible. Keep the gap between your intentions and your actions somewhere you have to look at it. The discomfort of that visibility is the mechanism that drives correction.

Fifth, and perhaps most importantly, remember why you started. The habits worth building are not ends in themselves. They are the means by which you become the person you are trying to become. The workout is not the point. The father, the leader, the man of faith, the person of genuine excellence, who is formed by consistent physical discipline, that is the point. When week three is hard, come back to that. Not to motivation. Return to your purpose.

Getting Past the Front Door Is Only the Beginning

James Clear is right. The heaviest weight at the gym is the front door. Getting started is hard, and anything that helps you reduce the friction of beginning is genuinely useful.

But the front door is not the finish line. It is the starting line. And the race that begins on the other side of it is longer, harder, and more demanding than any motivational framework fully prepares you for.

Four hundred episodes in five and a half years. New jobs, new cities, new children, grief, exhaustion, and more imperfect weeks than I can count. The podcast did not survive because conditions were always favorable. It survived because I decided early on that conditions were not the variable. My response to conditions was the variable.

That decision, made once and then made again and again in every hard moment that followed, is the only thing that separates the person who publishes episode four hundred from the person who published episode three and stopped.

Establish the habit first. Survive week three. Play hurt when you have to. Rest when you are injured. Review honestly. Come back when you fall off. And keep coming back.

That is the whole thing. It is not complicated. It is just hard.

Do it anyway.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals