Seeking Excellence
Politics • Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle
The Deadliest Poison: A Reflection on the Life of St. Maximillian Kolbe
How can we learn to confront, and avoid, apathy in our lives? Let's look at this Saint's example -
November 22, 2023
post photo preview

One of my heroes was born on January 8th, 1894 in the Kingdom of Poland, part of the Russian Empire. He received a vision of the Blessed Virgin Mary when he was only 12 years old, during which she predicted that he would persevere in purity and become a martyr for our Faith. By age 21, he received his first doctorate degree in Philosophy. At age 28, he received his second doctorate in Theology.

He became a priest and witnessed angry demonstrations against the popes of his time, including Pope St. Pius X. He was a writer and a missionary, founding multiple monasteries in Japan and India. His health forced him to return home to Poland in 1936. Three short years later, the Nazis invaded Poland on September 1, 1939. Life for this man would never be the same.

Despite his own health challenges, he was one of the few who remained in his monastery and even went so far as to open a temporary hospital there to help those in need. He spent three months in prison after his town was invaded, but was then released. He was given an opportunity to avoid future persecution, but refused to sign a document that would protect him as a German citizen because of his German ancestry. He went on to hide over 2,000 Jews in his monastery and began printing many anti-Nazi German publications from their printing house. On February 17, 1941, he was arrested and the monastery shut down. He was taken to the Pawiak prison for three months before being transferred to Auschwitz.

During all this, he never abandoned his priesthood. He remained committed to his identity and the Church. Mother Mary’s prediction would eventually come true when he volunteered his life to take the place of a man with a family who was being sent to be starved to death. After two weeks of starvation and dehydration, he still hadn’t died. The Nazis injected him with a lethal poison, to which he willingly gave his arm.

This man was St. Maximillian Kolbe. In my opinion, he is one of the greatest saints of the last 2000 years of Church history. He was the epitome of a warrior for Christ. He was a man he knew who he was and what he was here to do.

St. Maximillian Kolbe endured tremendous suffering and saw evil in its rawest and truest forms. He lived in both Russian and Nazi occupied Poland. He was a missionary to foreign lands where he undoubtedly saw the reality of extreme poverty. He was alive for both WWI and WWII, witnessing one of the harshest concentration camps from the inside. We have many great quotes from this man, but one that has always stood out to me the most was when he shared his thoughts the greatest evil of our time:

“The most deadly poison of our times is indifference” –St. Maximillian Kolbe

Imagine that. Imagine going through life having seen and experienced all that he did, seeing the absolute worst of mankind – then someone asks you, “what do you think is the greatest problem in the world today?”

Hate? No.

Violence? No.

War? Nope.

Poverty? Negative.

It’s indifference.

It’s apathy. It’s the fact that all of those things are happening all over the world and too many people simply do not care. People with the ability, resources, and oftentimes the awareness, do nothing to provide a solution. It brings me back to the timeless Edmund Burke quote, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to sit aside and do nothing.”

Are you one of the good people doing nothing?

Short term memory loss

It’s amazing to me how quickly we as humans can forget things. Have you ever had a day or a season in your life be so bad that you assumed everything after it would be relatively easy? I’m sure we all have. I know I have multiple times. This week, I reflected more and more on my time in the Dominican Republic on three different mission trips. Those trips were filled with love, service, and the Holy Spirit. The experiences I had there permanently changed my view on material goods and the bountiful blessings that are afforded to me as a middle-class American.

The most interesting part of my third trip was getting to see others go through these same experiences I had had multiple times now. This group was the biggest we had gone with yet, and definitely had the highest average age across the board. We usually traveled with other college kids, but this time had more middle aged people than usual. Some of them had allowed decades to pass between their last gritty form of service, and it showed.

It was amazing to see the unwillingness to submit themselves to certain discomforts for a ten-day period of time. Even once returning to the United States, it stunned me to see the quickness with which appreciation for the finer things in life (like warm showers, air conditioning, and fully functioning toilets) evaporated in that American air.  

To be fair to my fellow missionaries, this experience of taking things for granted isn’t unique to middle aged, first time mission trip goers. We all do it almost every single day. Firmly aware of the injustices taking place around the world and even in our own country, we can barely afford the time to even pray for the victims, let alone contribute our time and treasure to the point of sacrifice.

One of the most devastating consequences of this return to comfort and ease is that we lose sight of all the experiences that once moved us to change the way that we live. When we go through a life altering experience, like losing a loved one or going on a spiritual retreat, we discover this deep understanding of reality. It pushes us to approach life in a new way. It drives us to cherish our time with loved ones, be more generous with our possessions, and to share the wisdom and insights from what we’ve learned with those we encounter. Almost each time though, as the hours and days pass, we get more comfortable as normalcy resettles around us. We forget these hard earned nuggets of wisdom and our lives look eerily similar to the way they did prior to the experience.

Many resolutions and commitments made on the tail end of trying times go unfinished because we sprint away from the pain, which is coupled with the wisdom, at the first opportunity. It takes great humility and courage to not take people and things for granted in your life. Why? Because it forces you to realize that you are not any different from those suffering from extreme poverty in other places in the world who were never given a chance at prosperity. It leaves you no choice but to actually live the lessons you learned, and we all know that application and doing are the hardest parts of changing. Personal comfort leads to indifference to the struggles going on in the lives of other people.

We can’t all solve every problem in the world, especially not on our own. But I’m willing to bet that we could all do a little bit more to help make the world a better place. I think one of the best places to start is evaluating the root causes of this indifference and apathy that we are plagued with, and examining how it might be in effect in our own lives. What’s keeping you from playing a bigger role in the battle between good and evil in our world today?


The Roots of Apathy

Victim Mentality

One of the first things that we lose when we are attentive to the needs of others is the ability to play the victim. Every time you turn on the news today, you will hear somebody blaming another person for their own misfortune. Whenever life isn’t going the way we hoped or expected, the easiest thing to do is look to our left and right in order to find someone responsible for our lack of success. I heard it all the time growing up in Harrisburg, during my time in the military, and even more now in my work for the Church.

Human beings often think that because they cannot control everything, they cannot really control anything. Sadly, we often spend so much time trying to control what we can’t control (viz. other people) that we seldom take time to really determine what is under our sphere of influence. You are the sum total of the choices you have made up to this point in your life. Sure, some people may have had a head start on you in a lot of ways, but you’ve also had a head start on many others as well. Do you focus more on what you don’t have and haven’t been given, or on what you do have and have been given in your life?

I constantly try to remind myself and other people that there are true victims out there in this world. There are people who have no ability to change their situation. These are the people who are victims of sex trafficking, slavery, wrongful imprisonments, and brutal dictatorships. These are child soldiers, people in caste systems, and prisoners of war. We don’t have to dwell on such depressing thoughts all the time in order to be grateful for what we have, but it does help to occasionally call to mind that there are situations much worse than the ones we find ourselves in.

“It could be worse” was a simple motto that often got us through difficult times in the Army. We would brainstorm situations that would actually make our current predicament more miserable. Sure, we might be wet, cold, and hungry, but at least we didn’t have to climb a mountain during this mission. You might have a heavy ruck to carry, but at least you didn’t also have to carry a 17lb machine gun along with it’s ammunition. You may have to go on a five mile run in the rain, but at least you were going to get a great big breakfast afterwards. It could always be worse.

Pessimism

The other side of this lovely coin is that wonderful opposing truth, “it could always be better.” While it is helpful in certain situations to think of how life could be worse in order to muster up the strength to persevere, there are also times where we must reflect on what could improve. More importantly, we should focus on the ways in which we can personally do something to affect positive change in our circumstances and in the lives of other people.

Pessimism runs rampant in our world today. We get so caught up in thinking of how bad things are and how bad things can be that we fail to dream of a better future, let alone start working towards it. A joyful life requires that we “rejoice even in our sufferings” (Romans 5:3). The exercise of imagining how your life could be worse is meant to bring you gratitude for hidden blessings, but it doesn’t end here.  Gratitude should always lead to action through generosity and optimism. This thankfulness should shift our thinking from negative to positive, allowing us to see outside of our current pain and find creative ways to bring even greater joy to those around us. Even though I have a heavy ruck to carry, I’m now grateful that I don’t have to lug the big machine gun around. This should move me to go offer a snack or an encouraging word to the man who is carrying such a burden. When that gratitude ends with me, the process is only half complete. For most people, the process never even begins.

You get to choose the way you think. I’m willing to bet that you know an abundance of negative people. The common misconception is that these people are negative because of some outside forces or because of some determined “personality type” they’ve had since birth. In Man’s Search for Meaning, holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl says that the last of human freedoms is our freedom to choose how we will respond to the things we face in life, the freedom to choose our attitude. Negative people are negative because they choose to be that way. This blinds them from reality and keeps them from seeing the beautiful possibilities that could exist, which leads to apathy. If nothing will get better, why should you even try to change yourself or the world around you?

What attitude will you choose to have today?

Distractions

I know that the devil loves himself some distractions. Our Enemy has worked tirelessly over the past century to get us to be as busy and distracted as he possibly could, and he has done so with great success. Think of how obsessed we are with being busy. Ask anybody you know how they’ve been over the past couple weeks and the answer is almost always “busy, busy, busy.” Every person prides themselves on the level of busy they attempt to maintain. Sure, their “busy” schedule might include hours and hours of Netflix, social media, and time at the bar, but don’t you dare try and add something else into their “jammed packed” schedules.

Busy, in my opinion, often just becomes synonymous with distracted, i.e. operating life with no priorities. The constant noise and entertainment prevents us from having a moment to really evaluate our effectiveness and the true importance, or true pointlessness, of what we are doing. Life is all about your priorities. To be successful in the world’s eyes, just stay really busy, but to be significant, it’s going to take some serious intentionality. Distractions and busyness will keep you from caring about what really needs your attention.

Obsession with self

Toddlers are awesome. Their laughs are always adorable and they can be incredibly entertaining. They have such a pure innocence and trust those who take care of them so deeply. Then again, we don’t call that second year of life the “terrible two’s” for nothing. Small children can be incredibly difficult as they go through this gigantic perspective shift that allows them to see that the world does not revolve around them. There are other people who matter too, so the child can’t always have things his or her way. It’s a painful but important journey. We often evaluate someone’s upbringing by how well their parents helped them make this shift.

For some reason, our society is pushing more and more for this two-year-old mentality to be the norm for adults. We are pushing this idea that one’s self is the only person you should really care about.  Self-love, self-care, and self-acceptance are touted as the greatest virtues of our time. They are elevated above self-stewardship and personal responsibility. The world pushes us to be more obsessed with gaining more “rights” and forgetting our responsibilities. In today’s society, you are told to flee from the consequences of your actions. Whether you become pregnant, have student loans, or choose not to work a job, there are people who say the consequences of those actions should be simply wiped away. Why? Because you should have a “right” to choose, a “right” to not have to be burdened by loans, and a “right” to a ‘living’ wage. You also should have a “right” to force your beliefs on other people, making them conform to new ways of pronoun, bathroom, and locker room rules through a new, deeply flawed approach to biology in general.

People’s feelings have been elevated above the English language, the religious liberties of others, and even the right to life for the most defenseless among us. We are empowering a small, yet very loud, minority to take away basic human rights such as the right to freedom of speech and religion, and even the right to life. This minority moves in the shadows behind the guise of tolerance and acceptance, while they actually fight to develop a society who doesn’t tolerate or accept those who disagree with them.

The purpose of society is to help one another protect our true rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. When we adopt this selfish thinking, we cease considering those rights in regards to others and only seek to protect them for ourselves. “Who cares if more African American babies are killed in the womb than are born in New York city? It hasn’t affected my day to day life, right?”

Self-obsession leads us to focusing on our own problems to the extent that we can no longer see, tend to, or even care about the needs of others. This tunnel vision in our own lives causes us to want to play the victim. Self-obsession leads to indifference.

The Way Out

Our lives require context. Whenever things are taken out of context, confusion ensues. We have to keep in mind that we are playing an eternal game in life. We are striving to live holy lives in this life so that we can worship God for eternity in the next. Never lose sight of the goal. We have to also keep in mind that we have a deep and heavy responsibility to leave this world better than we found it. We can’t do this if we are indifferent toward these duties. This undertaking can easily seem overwhelming, but it just comes back to these basic choices:

  1. Choose to play the hero, not the victim
  2. Choose to have a positive attitude
  3. Choose to rid your life of the people and things that distract you from what is most important
  4. Choose to be selfless – give yourself to God and others generously in every way that you can

These things are simple, but not easy. It takes time, perseverance, and accountability from the good people around us to even get close to mastering these things in our short lifetimes. The difficult things in life are often the most rewarding. Choosing to fight this battle, to be a light in the midst of all this darkness, is the best decision you will ever make.

community logo
Join the Seeking Excellence Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
2
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
The Santa debate!

Is Promoting Santa a Lie? Or Is It Innocent Fun?

00:14:22
"My daughter was really offended by your talk last night." 😅

"My daughter was really offended by your talk last night."

Someone dropped this bomb on me unexpectedly after daily mass this past summer. Although I can sometimes be a bit dicey and bold in my presentations, I was pretty shocked to hear it.

I had given a talk to middle schoolers the night prior on how our faith can help us in managing sadness, anxiety, and stress.

After mass the next day, I was walking in the convention center and was stopped by a woman who asked if I spoke to the middle schoolers the night prior. I responded in the affirmative.

"My daughter was really offended by your talk."

In a flash, I try to recall what I said that might have been the trigger for offense. Nothing came to mind. So I inquired, "Interesting. What was it that bothered her?"

"She said that you told the kids that if you experience anxiety, you can essentially pray it all away. And she has been clinically diagnosed with severe anxiety so it upset her."

"AH okay, I see the misunderstanding here" I ...

00:56:59
I am a Charlie Kirk, not a George Floyd

Over the last few days, I've taken a lot of time to reflect on the importance of this moment for our nation and for the Church.

Here are further reflections on these recent events and what I think we ought to do from here.

00:36:22
Simple Weekly Review Document!

I meant to have this posted on Wednesday when the episode dropped, but here is the simple form that Emily and I have used for years! We usually use the next page of the document to write out tasks in two columns, one for each of us.

Enjoy!

Weekly_Review_Sample.pdf
Be the Parent Your Kids Actually Need

It can be extremely tempting to take the easy way out when it comes to parenting.

Giving the kid the iPad. Letting bad behavior slide. Not disciplining consistently.

In today's podcast episode, I talk about the importance of making those hard parenting decisions and how they will lead to a better tomorrow for you and your kids.

Watch here!

What It Really Means to Lead Your Family Spiritually

As a husband and father, what does it look like to lead spiritually?

Using biblical insights and expert opinion, this episode dives into spiritual leadership!

Watch now:

Father, Not Friend

Gentle parenting is everywhere right now. It fills Instagram feeds, dominates parenting podcasts, and has become the default philosophy for a generation of well-meaning mothers and fathers who want to do better than their own parents did. At its core, the movement emphasizes emotional attunement, empathy, and explaining your reasoning to your children rather than simply demanding obedience.

And I want to be fair: some of that is genuinely good. Connection matters. Emotional intelligence matters. Treating your children as human beings worthy of explanation and respect matters. I do not dismiss any of that.

But taken to its logical extreme, gentle parenting produces something I find deeply troubling: children who have never truly been told no, who have never experienced a consequence they could not negotiate or emotionally outlast, who have been so carefully protected from discomfort that they have never developed the internal capacity to endure it.

I know what that looks like from the inside. Because I was that kid.

What Too Much Freedom Actually Looks Like

My father was not a bad man. But he was an absent one, emotionally if not always physically. He never asked about my grades. He never inquired about my friends. He never wanted to know what I was doing or where I was going. And when I got in trouble, which I did frequently during my first two years of high school, the consequences were almost nonexistent. I would come home having collected another detention, another suspension, and the response was barely a shrug.

Part of the reason I started smoking weed and drinking at 14 was simply that nobody was watching. My parents were too busy working six days a week to enforce a standard. The boundaries that should have been there were not. And nature, as it always does, filled that vacuum. In my case, it filled it with exactly the kind of life I did not want.

I have shared before that at 15, I hit rock bottom. I was on the verge of selling drugs. I had given up basketball, one of the great loves of my life. I was living a double life, seemingly happy on the outside and completely empty on the inside. And when I look back and trace the roots of how I got there, one of the clearest threads is this: I had too much freedom and too few consequences for far too long.

My father's version of parenting lacked a philosophical foundation. It was rooted in absence and indifference. But the result is not entirely different from what you see when parents are so committed to never making their child uncomfortable that they abandon the responsibility to form them. A child without consistent discipline is a child without a father, even if his father is standing in the same room.

Coming Home to Chaos

I came home recently after nearly seven days on the road. I had worked through the weekend. I was tired in that bone-deep way that does not go away with a single good night's sleep. And when I walked through the front door, there was no warm greeting waiting for me.

My 3-year-old son was mid-tantrum. Two out of three nights that week, I walked straight from the driveway into full disciplinarian mode. No transition. No runway. No chance to decompress. Just a small human testing every limit he could find, and a father who had to decide in real time whether to hold the line or let it slide.

I will be honest with you. Everything in me wanted to let it slide. I was exhausted. I felt guilty about being away. I wanted connection, not conflict. And there is a version of myself, a less-formed version, who would have looked the other way, bought peace with permissiveness, and told myself I was being kind.

But I have learned something important about toddlers that changes everything: they cannot yet reason. They cannot think abstractly. They cannot hear a lengthy explanation of why their behavior is problematic and internalize it as a change in conduct. What they can do is experience immediate, consistent consequences and begin to understand that certain behaviors produce certain outcomes every single time. That is not cruelty. That is how you teach a creature who is not yet capable of being taught any other way.

So I held the line. Tired, stretched thin, and holding the line anyway. Because that is the job.

What the Bible Actually Says About Discipline

Hebrews 12 is the passage I come back to most when I think about this. It reads: "For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives. It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons."

Read that again. The absence of discipline is presented not as kindness but as abandonment. A child left without correction is not being treated as a son. He is being treated as someone his father does not care enough about to form.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
White Robes and Pony Tails
Should We Have Female Altar Servers?

A friend reached out to me recently with a question she had been sitting with for a while. She wanted to know where I stood on female altar servers. She was genuinely curious, not combative, and I appreciated that. I shared my opinion on the matter with her. We prefer attending mass at parishes that have only male altar servers.

I explained my reasoning, but admittedly, I thought it lacked enough depth. It is the kind of question that deserves a thoughtful answer rather than a reflexive one, so I did some digging.

What I found was more interesting than I expected. And it brought me back to something I had observed long before I ever thought seriously about liturgical tradition.

What I Saw Growing Up

I converted to the Catholic faith at 13. I never served as an altar boy. But I have been involved in parish life in various ways ever since, as a lector, an usher, and an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion. I care deeply about the Church and about what happens inside the walls of my parish.

And what I remember noticing, even as a young convert still finding his footing, was this: faith felt like a woman's game.

The cantor was a woman. The lectors were women. The altar servers were girls. The Extraordinary Ministers were women. Up front, actively participating in the sacred action of the Mass, there were almost entirely women and a priest. The men, many of them, stood in the back. Literally. Arms folded. Going through the motions at best and completely checking out at worst.

And over time, most of those men stopped coming. They drifted out the back doors they had been standing near and never came back. And most of their kids, the ones I grew up around, do not practice the faith today.

Now, I want to be careful here. I am not making a sweeping causal claim. There were many factors behind those men leaving. But I will say this: the active, visible, participatory life of the Church never seemed to be calling them. It never seemed to be designed with them in mind. And that observation has stayed with me.

The Chicken and the Egg

Here is the honest question I keep coming back to: Did the Church become predominantly female in its active participation because men were already disengaging? Or did men disengage, at least in part, because the active roles of parish life increasingly felt like they belonged to women?

I do not think anyone can answer that definitively. It is a classic chicken-and-egg problem. But I do think it is a question worth sitting with honestly, rather than dismissing it as retrograde or uncharitable to women.

Because here is what we know for certain: the vocations crisis in the American Catholic Church is real. It is severe. And it is not evenly distributed.

The Lincoln Exception

The Diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska, is one of the best-kept secrets in American Catholicism. While dioceses across the country struggle with priest shortages, parish closures, and dwindling Mass attendance, Lincoln tells a different story.

According to data from the Official Catholic Directory and Catholic News Agency, Lincoln has approximately one active priest for every 737 Catholics. The national average is one priest for every 4,723 Catholics. Let that sink in for a moment. Lincoln is not just outperforming the national average; it is also outperforming the state average. It is lapping it. The diocese has so many priests that it sends them to serve in other dioceses that are struggling.

Lincoln is also, as of this writing, the only diocese in the United States that maintains a male-only altar server policy across the entire diocese.

That is not a coincidence I am willing to simply wave away.

What Rome Actually Said

In 1994, the Vatican clarified that female altar servers are permitted under canon law, leaving the decision to each local bishop. But what often gets left out of that story is what else Rome said in the same document.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
ICE - A Catholic Perspective

Two Conversations, One Messy Topic

There are topics that reveal something about a person's character by how they approach them, not by what they conclude. Immigration enforcement in America right now is one of those topics. It has become so emotionally loaded, so thoroughly captured by tribal politics, that it is genuinely difficult to find people willing to hold a complex thought about it for more than thirty seconds.

I had two conversations recently that stuck with me, not because they resolved anything, but because they each illustrated a different way of being wrong about this.

The first was with a friend who describes himself as a moderate. He thinks the way ICE treats some people is terrible. He also thinks illegal immigration is a real problem that can't be wished away. He was genuinely curious to hear my perspective, open to where it might take him. That kind of intellectual honesty is rarer than it should be, and I appreciated it.

The second was with a Church leader. A man with real experience watching ICE operate in Southern California, and with family members of Mexican heritage who, despite holding legal status, live in fear of what federal enforcement might mean for people they know. He came to the conversation having already decided what I believed. He seemed to assume I was a Trump loyalist who didn't care about human suffering. He wasn't interested in engaging the complexity. Rather, he wanted to register his objection and move on.

What struck me about both conversations was that neither person was wrong about everything. The coworker was right that illegal immigration is a genuine problem. The Church leader was right that ICE has real accountability issues and that human dignity is not optional. But both were operating with incomplete pictures. And that incomplete picture, whether it comes from the left or the right, is ultimately what makes this issue so hard to think about clearly.

Before I go further: I am not a Trump die-hard. I think he is a generally capable president who is doing a genuinely difficult job that most people would fail at, while also carrying serious personal and political flaws that matter and should be named. I don't believe the ends always justify the means. I also don't believe that disapproving of Trump's style or character is the same thing as having a coherent immigration policy. Those are two different conversations, and we keep mixing them up.

This article is my attempt to disentangle them.

The Numbers Nobody Wants to Sit With

What Actually Happened Under Biden

Any honest conversation about ICE enforcement has to start here, because the emotional temperature of this debate is largely a reaction to what happened at the border from 2021 to 2024.

According to the Pew Research Center's 2025 analysis, the unauthorized immigrant population in the United States reached 14 million in 2023, the highest level ever recorded. In 2021, when Biden took office, that number was approximately 11 million. That is a meaningful increase of roughly three million people in two years, a pace Pew described as record-setting.

Border encounters the metric used by Customs and Border Protection to track every individual stopped or apprehended at the southern border averaged approximately two million per year from 2021 to 2023, according to the Washington Post's analysis of government data. For context, the yearly average during Trump's first term was roughly one-quarter of that.

Now, it is important to be precise here, as both sides abuse these numbers in different ways. Encounters are not the same as permanent residents. Many people encountered are removed or returned. Many who were allowed in were placed in immigration proceedings, meaning they had legal protections pending court dates, not permanent legal status. The Trump administration's claim that "20 million illegal immigrants" entered under Biden is not supported by data, and responsible commentary should say so.

But the growth was real. A Heritage Foundation analysis estimated that approximately 6.7 million new unauthorized residents entered the country between January 2021 and end of 2023. Pew's more conservative estimate put the net unauthorized population at 14 million by mid-2023, up from 11 million. Either way, it represents the largest increase in the unauthorized immigrant population in recorded history. Anyone who denies that a significant problem developed is not being honest.

Much of the growth was driven by Biden administration policies, particularly parole programs for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (the so-called CHNV program) that allowed people to enter the country with temporary protected status rather than going through traditional immigration channels. These were not people sneaking across the desert. They were arriving through programs that critics argued effectively created a backdoor to legal residence. The Biden administration ended those programs in mid-2024, which slowed the growth, but by then, the number was already at a historic peak.

The Obama Comparison Everyone Is Avoiding

Here is the thing that nobody on the left seems willing to engage honestly, and it is perhaps the single most clarifying fact in this entire debate.

Barack Obama deported approximately 3.1 million people over his two terms more than any modern president before him. Immigrant rights groups were so alarmed by his enforcement record that they gave him the nickname "Deporter in Chief." In 2013 alone, his administration deported 432,000 people, the highest single-year total ever recorded.

Trump's first term deportation total was approximately 1.2 million people, significantly less than Obama's eight-year total. Even combining Trump's first term with what his second term has produced so far, his cumulative numbers do not yet approach Obama's. In 2025, the Trump administration carried out roughly 540,000 deportations compared to Obama's 612,000 in 2013 alone, during the first year of his second term.

To be clear: there are real methodological debates here about how deportations are counted, whether border removals and interior removals should be compared the same way, and how Title 42 expulsions are classified. These are legitimate distinctions. But they do not erase the basic fact: the man the left is calling a fascist for deporting people is doing so at a pace that Obama sustained for eight years without anything like the current outrage.

And then there is Tom Homan.

Homan is Trump's Border Czar. He is the face of the current enforcement operation, the man at whom protesters direct their anger, the person whose name has become a symbol of what critics consider cruel and draconian immigration policy. In 2025, he became nationally known for aggressive interior sweeps, threatening to arrest local officials who impede ICE operations, and overseeing enforcement actions that have, at times, detained and transported people with clean records and legal status.

What is less commonly discussed is that, in 2013, Barack Obama appointed Tom Homan to run ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations. The Obama administration awarded him the government's highest civil service honor, the Presidential Rank Award for Distinguished Service, in 2015. The official ICE press release at the time specifically praised his leadership in expanding deportation capacity, increasing detention beds, and managing the surge of unaccompanied children across the Southwest border.

The Washington Post, in 2015, ran a piece about Homan under the headline: "Thomas Homan deports people. And he's really good at it." That was a compliment.

Trump hired the same man. Obama honored him for doing the same job. Democrats had no significant objection to Homan's work during the Obama years. They are now calling him a Nazi.

I am not saying this to be provocative. I am saying it because if your objection is truly to the tactics of immigration enforcement and not to the fact that a Republican is doing it, then you have some explaining to do about why the same person was your hero nine years ago.

Why the Current Enforcement Looks Different And Why 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals