Women are hard to understand, and my wife is no exception. In a marriage, both parties tend to do things that appear nonsensical to the other person. Last week, my wife, along with 10 million other Americans, woke up around 4:00 AM to watch the coronation of King Charles III. Personally, I’d rather watch a caterpillar work its way across a football field than watch a bunch of British people parade around in goofy outfits, but my wife thinks the coronation is spectacularly engaging.
My issue with royal family events is simple: I just don’t understand the point of it all. Why would anyone want to have a king?
Many people throughout history hated of their kings, pharaohs, and emperors because these rulers don’t have constituents, they have subjects. This means that kings don’t give their people a chance to vote or any other opportunity to influence the direction of the country. Most rulers had to convince their subjects that they were divine for this very reason. If someone is going to dominate every aspect of my life through brute force, it helps me to cooperate if I somehow believe that person is a god.
I’ve never been the victim of an armed robbery, but I imagine it’s the experience of a lifetime of being a subject to a king concentrated into a few extremely stressful minutes. The man with the gun tells you what to do, how to do it, with no explanation of why, and then forces you to pay him for the PTSD-inducing experience. Knowing the robber, like a king, lives an extravagant lifestyle of fame and riches while you struggle to make ends meet would make it even more infuriating.
Surely some of the British who support the monarchy have a better understanding of the purpose that the crown serves. However, others undoubtedly have simply never stopped to wonder about the reason they have royals at all. Many of the citizens of the United Kingdom must find themselves blissfully ignorant, a state of consciousness that has become commonplace in our age of distraction by technology.
When was the last time you wondered about the purpose of our own government? Over the years, our government has gotten bigger, more influential, and has extended its reach into nearly every aspect of American life. Regardless of whether you view this as good or bad, it’s good to recognize that we have accepted this as normal. Political candidates make promises, then we citizens develop expectations. Once elected, the politicians use the power of government to spend and expand to fulfill those expectations (at least to some degree).
When we vote for a candidate running for office, we are essentially voting to hire for an open position in the company that is our country. Therefore, it would be good to understand the job description to truly know whether or not they are a good fit for the role. You don’t get to vote for a king, but you do get to vote for your president. The massive differences in the powers of a supreme ruler and those of a president come from the fact that the president is one of us whom we’ve selected to lead, rather than a god who is destined to rule.
If the last 247 years have taught us anything, it’s that nearly all elected officials want more power than their predecessor had. To expand powers, you must expand your purpose. This is why, in less than 300 years, the American people have gone from expecting their government to protect their freedoms to pursue their wants and needs to expecting their government to provide their wants and needs, even if it means reducing their freedoms.
In order to limit the power of government, we must be willing to limit its purpose. To limit the purpose of government, we must first understand its purpose, which is to protect our natural rights, to establish and enforce the rule of law, and to ensure equal protection under the law for all people. The government is meant to protect, not to provide. If we don’t understand and embrace this truth, the insatiable hunger of politicians for more and more power will soon change the status of Americans from that of citizens to those of subjects, or worse, to the realm of total dependents devoid of any ability to use our life and liberty to pursue happiness.